| *) Being back in the show circus after 2 years of sabbatical, the Wunderbaum gang now also publishes its show results from 2004 on.
As a little surplus we also add our personal judge's evaluation - as we always only have to accept what judges say we take the chance here to give our points to their performance. it is us who pay for their services - so they should listen to their customers. last not least the competition among the semilonghair judges will become tougher in the next years when 36 more student judges will upgrade ... and then the clubs will have to listen which judge to invite to get the maximum of exhibitors.
The points for the judges do NOT mean a thankyou for a good placement but are dedicated to the real professional performance (what can also sometimes mean an Ex2).
it is still kind of difficult to find the right scheme - so the "judges report" is due to update upon our experiences.
REMARKS
a) was not his best day, so no evaluation
b) is worth 4 stars for his empathy for the cats - last star withheld because of not daring for his real opinion when it comes to nomination: in short: "this is my best cat - but this colour /distribution is too complicated to communicate it to the panel"
c) good knowledge as judge, but unprofessional habit:, when he told an exhibitor in front of a judges student: "You know yourself what is wrong with your cat - I must not explain thsi to you. This would be a farce". That mentioned cat got her CAC , the report did not explain any faults either - but for what are judges paid ???????
d) makes a show event out of the nominations
e) forestcats must not have round heads and must not be carried like SBI
f) he is back to his best form (compare a)
g) would prefer his written reports the way he does his verbal explanations - then 4 stars
h) altogether 0,5 points plus: The easter show in Arnhem showed judjes in the best mood: tough, but also explaining in depth
|
